Start Date
Immediate
Expiry Date
11 Dec, 25
Salary
4.728
Posted On
11 Sep, 25
Experience
0 year(s) or above
Remote Job
Yes
Telecommute
Yes
Sponsor Visa
No
Skills
Mobility, Steps, Diplomas, Cvs, Case
Industry
Education Management
Vacancy number
15971
Job type
Academic staff
Hours (in fte)
1,0
External/ internal
External , Internal
Location
Den Haag
Placed on
11 September 2025
Closing date
16 October 2025 35 more days to apply
WHAT YOU BRING
In this team, we are looking for someone who can work independently. Every job is different, so in the beginning we will devote attention to your onboarding. If some of the work activities are new to you, we will look together at what you need, and draw up a development plan. This position is a good fit for you if you recognise yourself in the following:
Selection Criteria: Essential
Selection Criteria: Preferred
If you immediately recognise yourself in this profile, or if do you not quite meet all the requirements, but you believe that this is the right job for you, we look forward to your application!
The Post-Doctoral researcher will be appointed for a period of eighteen months and contribute to the overall development of the project. The candidate is expected to carry out at least one research trip to a selected Special Political Mission of interest, which will be determined on the basis of the expertise of the PostDoc. This must lead to at least one publication in an international peer-reviewed journal. In addition, the candidate is expected to contribute to the conceptual and theoretical development of the overall project and co-author further journal articles with the Principal Investigator. The PostDoc is also expected (for 20% of the contract) to assist with teaching across several programs within the institute.
Key responsibilities
Background to the Research Project
Conflict management norms in multilateral fora such as the UN Security Council are in flux. There is ambiguity and uncertainty surrounding the future of collective conflict management. This context makes it more difficult for UN peace operations to interpret mandates and political directives, which already tend to be static, ambiguous, and insufficiently contextualised to complex and fast-changing environments.
In this project, we develop two research lines. The first investigates the opportunities and challenges of the UN’s Special Political Missions as a potentially promising instrument to both address some of the shortcomings of current templates and generate consensus among UN member states. These missions are more squarely focused on the politics of peace processes, light-footprint, and support the conflict parties in things like mediation and the implementation of peace agreements. They are increasingly being operationalised to manage conflict globally because large military peace operations are no longer considered an option due to their cost, inability to resolve the conflict, and a deficit of viable exit strategies. However, we have relatively little knowledge about what they do, how they function, and how effective they are.
The second research line asks how the staff and leadership operating in Special Political Missions navigate this increased ambiguity. How do SPM staff interpret and action UN mandates at mission level? How can we explain variation in mission level interpretation of top-down directives? How do SPM staff navigate international and regional competition in their mission areas?
To answer these questions, we use a comparative case study across different types of SPMs on three continents. This research contributes to scholarship on how global governance is dealing with the crisis of multilateralism and debates on organisational culture, principal-agent relationships, and micro-level responses to macro-level ambiguity.