Reviewer BTEC Nationals AAQ Health & Social Care

at  Pearson

London, England, United Kingdom -

Start DateExpiry DateSalaryPosted OnExperienceSkillsTelecommuteSponsor Visa
Immediate30 Nov, 2024Not Specified14 Nov, 2024N/ACommunication Skills,Information TechnologyNoNo
Add to Wishlist Apply All Jobs
Required Visa Status:
CitizenGC
US CitizenStudent Visa
H1BCPT
OPTH4 Spouse of H1B
GC Green Card
Employment Type:
Full TimePart Time
PermanentIndependent - 1099
Contract – W2C2H Independent
C2H W2Contract – Corp 2 Corp
Contract to Hire – Corp 2 Corp

Description:

EXPERIENCE/QUALIFICATIONS NEEDED

  • Educated to a level 4 standard or above with relevant qualifications for the sector/subject area of choice
  • Preferably hold a relevant teaching qualification
  • Good communication skills
  • Confident use of Information technology to provide the review
  • Ability to meet deadlines
  • Desirable: Current experience of delivering the qualification
  • And/or if appropriate: Experience of working in the sector.

The ability to comment on the appropriateness of the qualification/unit in terms of:

  • Suitability of unit title(s), unit aims and unit abstract
  • Suitability of unit content in terms of its currency, depth/breadth of difficulty and amount
  • Appropriateness of grading descriptors (if used)
  • Suitability of delivery and assessment guidance
  • Currency and suitability of suggested resources
  • Overall impressions of the specification/unit in relation to its fitness for purpose for learners and their progression

Responsibilities:

PURPOSE

An external reviewer is expected to conduct a written or recorded verbal review of the appropriateness of qualification(s) or unit(s) assigned to them. The reviewer must have sector/subject knowledge and/or experience relevant to the qualification(s)/unit(s) being reviewed.
Unit 1 Human Lifespan & development 60309T
Unit 2 Human Biology & Health 60310T

RESPONSIBILITIES

The ability to comment on the appropriateness of the qualification/unit in terms of:

  • Suitability of unit title(s), unit aims and unit abstract
  • Suitability of unit content in terms of its currency, depth/breadth of difficulty and amount
  • Appropriateness of grading descriptors (if used)
  • Suitability of delivery and assessment guidance
  • Currency and suitability of suggested resources
  • Overall impressions of the specification/unit in relation to its fitness for purpose for learners and their progression.


REQUIREMENT SUMMARY

Min:N/AMax:5.0 year(s)

Education Management

HR / Administration / IR

Education, Teaching

Graduate

Proficient

1

London, United Kingdom